Good risk management seems to be a challenge
in most projects and can affect its delivery. The subject is often taught,
analysed, spoken about, and reported within organisations EPMO’s. It then comes
as a surprise when projects and programs fall well below their key delivery
benchmarks and, more often than not, the reason is an unidentified risk
manifesting itself into an issue that impacts adversely on delivery.
Considering the number of projects conducted and the documents associated to
risk, the effort that goes into quantifying the risks of a project should not
be missed, but they still do.
The following are possible reasons why risks
are still not always adequately identified, understood and how they can negatively
impact projects large and small alike.
Emphasis on regular outcomes
Project teams are hard-wired to deliver, and
never more so than in the current delivery environment that heavily favours
agile techniques whereby delivery is an on-going cycle. This emphasis upon
regular outcomes drives a delivery focussed mentality within many teams. This
focus can, however, have a negative impact on risk management as it is
exercised within the team.
As agile continues to propagate the emphasis
on continual delivery can make risk management seem like a handbrake to the
speed with which teams are now working at and as such it gets put to one side
in the rush to hit delivery deadlines.
Experience
IT Project Management within the business and
IT world is relatively new, unlike the construction industry whereby project
management has been taught and valued since ancient civilisations. The relatively
recent introduction of project management within the white-collar sector has
led to the rise of tertiary qualifications. There are also many stand-alone
bodies providing varying degrees of project management qualifications and risk
management.
The mechanics of managing risk can seem
straight forward from the comfort of a textbook or course. The reality of the effective
application of risk management can be varied when delivering a project.
Possibly for two reasons;
Firstly, good risk management requires the
ability to identify potential risks. This requires imagination or experience
which is often formed heavily by past experiences of what can happen in certain
situations. The lack of imagination or experience
can and normally does affect the risk assessment. For example, when laying
fibre cable, time should be added when dealing with Government bodies, such as
councils or heritage listed environments, all adding time to project delivery.
The second issue and how to avoid potential
risk, is the input or buy-in from a wide range of people. Some of whom may be
time poor or they may actually be hostile to the project. This is where
stakeholder management becomes critical. If a project manager does not have the
ability or experience to get all the right people engaged then running through
the risk management process per the textbook will not be enough.
Only positive news
Many organisations expect or want only good
news, which is valued by the executive over the ‘real’ news. This drives
certain sub-optimal behaviours in an organisation that will work its way down
into project delivery. Calling out risks frequently and possible issues can be
seen as antagonistic to an executive who just wants to hear about what is going
well.
This dynamic can lead to the less experienced
or robust project manager to prioritise the good news over the possible bad
news and keep the risk and issues toned down or off the agenda altogether. This
is a head in the sand mentality that does not promote good risk management
practices.
The list above is not exhaustive but is a
good indicator of why risks continue to surprise some projects to their
detriment. Of course, identifying the risk is just the beginning and does not
mean they will manifest themselves into significant issues. If nothing else it
provides the team with the ability to have robust mitigation plans for them if
they occur.
Comments
Post a Comment