Skip to main content

The Challenges of Risk Management in Projects



Good risk management seems to be a challenge in most projects and can affect its delivery. The subject is often taught, analysed, spoken about, and reported within organisations EPMO’s. It then comes as a surprise when projects and programs fall well below their key delivery benchmarks and, more often than not, the reason is an unidentified risk manifesting itself into an issue that impacts adversely on delivery. Considering the number of projects conducted and the documents associated to risk, the effort that goes into quantifying the risks of a project should not be missed, but they still do.
The following are possible reasons why risks are still not always adequately identified, understood and how they can negatively impact projects large and small alike.

Emphasis on regular outcomes

Project teams are hard-wired to deliver, and never more so than in the current delivery environment that heavily favours agile techniques whereby delivery is an on-going cycle. This emphasis upon regular outcomes drives a delivery focussed mentality within many teams. This focus can, however, have a negative impact on risk management as it is exercised within the team.
As agile continues to propagate the emphasis on continual delivery can make risk management seem like a handbrake to the speed with which teams are now working at and as such it gets put to one side in the rush to hit delivery deadlines.

Experience

IT Project Management within the business and IT world is relatively new, unlike the construction industry whereby project management has been taught and valued since ancient civilisations. The relatively recent introduction of project management within the white-collar sector has led to the rise of tertiary qualifications. There are also many stand-alone bodies providing varying degrees of project management qualifications and risk management.
The mechanics of managing risk can seem straight forward from the comfort of a textbook or course. The reality of the effective application of risk management can be varied when delivering a project. Possibly for two reasons;
Firstly, good risk management requires the ability to identify potential risks. This requires imagination or experience which is often formed heavily by past experiences of what can happen in certain situations.  The lack of imagination or experience can and normally does affect the risk assessment. For example, when laying fibre cable, time should be added when dealing with Government bodies, such as councils or heritage listed environments, all adding time to project delivery.
The second issue and how to avoid potential risk, is the input or buy-in from a wide range of people. Some of whom may be time poor or they may actually be hostile to the project. This is where stakeholder management becomes critical. If a project manager does not have the ability or experience to get all the right people engaged then running through the risk management process per the textbook will not be enough.

Only positive news

Many organisations expect or want only good news, which is valued by the executive over the ‘real’ news. This drives certain sub-optimal behaviours in an organisation that will work its way down into project delivery. Calling out risks frequently and possible issues can be seen as antagonistic to an executive who just wants to hear about what is going well.
This dynamic can lead to the less experienced or robust project manager to prioritise the good news over the possible bad news and keep the risk and issues toned down or off the agenda altogether. This is a head in the sand mentality that does not promote good risk management practices.
The list above is not exhaustive but is a good indicator of why risks continue to surprise some projects to their detriment. Of course, identifying the risk is just the beginning and does not mean they will manifest themselves into significant issues. If nothing else it provides the team with the ability to have robust mitigation plans for them if they occur.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There is more to Information Security than just IT

The Empathetic Project Manager

Are you a project manager who understands your customer, sponsor or stakeholder? Who takes an empathetic approach to their requirements? Understand the effect of the planned change on the organisation and its people. Project Management deals with change that is the outcome of working on the project in the first place. Is it the role of the Project Manager to feel for the people the change is affecting? Understanding the human element of a project is an essential aspect of a quality project manager. The power of empathy enables a person to be of greater service to sponsors, clients, peers, superiors and subordinates.  As project management is about serving the needs of stakeholders and satisfying their expectations, empathy is a critical success factor. This is a lesson learnt over many years as a project manager, because People can often forget what has been said and done to them, depending on the enormity of the issue, but they will never forget how they have been made to f

How to Write a Smart Organizational Project Management Plan

What is the most efficient way to create a successful project plan? Without an accurate project plan, the project can be destined to fail, as inaccurate planning may seem minimal at the commencement, but by the end of the project can be catastrophic. Planning an entire project is not that easy, determining the length of task duration and effort, turning stakeholder expectation into concrete results. So what makes an ideal project management plan? Start With TOR The basis for a successful project plan is the terms of reference (TOR). Why? Because it helps to reach an agreement at the beginning of work. Later, when new requirements arise, and the scope of the project begins to expand, it will be possible to return to the TOR and check what the plan was initially intended for. The TOR should include a description of the goals and objectives of the project, its intermediate results, the definition of stages, a preliminary scope of work, the calculation of time and costs, as